August 1997 Volume 7 Number 8 PDM and ERP Continuing to Converge An ever-growing interest in Product Data Management (PDM) and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) forms the major theme at this year's three-day CIMdata Conference in Los Angeles. By Richard W. Bourke, CPIM
"When integrating PDM and ERP, there is no one correct answer, rather companies must take the time to examine their operations and carefully determine how PDM and ERP can best work together for them." Although there is no single correct answer for integrating PDM and ERP, the technical difficulties are being overcome; but the cultural barriers are still being breached. The PDM interfaces to the larger ERP software systems are usually two-way, with alternative methods for updating and a wide range of supporting technologies. In most instances, the interface on the lower-end PDM package is simpler. The concept of "enterprisewide" PDM permeates much of the thinking of the PDM community, which means focusing on one of the key integration points between PDM and ERP systems the bill of material. In several conference sessions, ownership of the bill of material was a key issue. A general consensus does seem to be taking shape in that respect: PDM should own the bill in the design and development phases of the product life cycle, ERP after release to manufacturing. More and more PDM vendors are announcing interfaces with ERP systems. Not surprisingly, most interface activity is taking place with the R/3 system of SAP. There are about a dozen certified PDM interfaces now available, or under development. Also not surprising, SAP initiated its long expected entry by announcing their R/3 PDM product at the show the first ERP vendor to be an exhibitor at a CIMdata conference. Baan, was indirectly represented by B. A. Intelligence Networks and its MANTA package, both acquired by Baan earlier in the year. In the future, the MANTA software will be fully integrated with the Baan ERP software to provide a one-stop solution for the combined needs of PDM and ERP. Oracle, temporarily at least, seems a bit behind the
power curve as its only available product is the two-way
integration software with Sherpa. A planned product with
Metaphase (now a part of SDRC) is in the future, perhaps
later this year. The "scope" of a PDM project the concern that
being too ambitious will lessen the chances for success
is a valid concern among users. However,
enterprisewide PDM is the refrain of many of the PDM vendors
as they seek to widen their product offerings to meet
customer needs and gain market share. While attractive from
a vision standpoint, the reality of such ambitious
undertakings causes PDM implementations to grow in budget
needs and time to implement. As Miller clearly stated:
"Focused solutions often get quicker acceptance and
success." The capabilities of these CSM third-party solutions for
classification activity are definitely a cut above most ERP
software capabilities. CSM vendors exhibiting included:
Aspect Development, Mountain View, Calif.; CADIS, Boulder,
Colo.; and International CompuTex, Huntersville, N.C. The Web approach makes simple viewing and browsing of
product information more affordable for the "casual" user
who does not need the strength of the "power" user. The
clear benefit of using the Web may well be to gain faster
acceptance of PDM value. Again, thinking in terms of PDM
vis-à-vis supply chain management, the use of the Web
will undoubtedly accelerate the communication with suppliers
and further reduce the information flow time in the
pipeline.
Richard W. Bourke, CPIM, is a consultant based in Pasadena, Calif., with extensive experience in all phases of systems planning and implementation. He has been reporting on the status of PDM for APICS since 1991. He can be reached at webmaster@lionhrtpub.com |