|
August 1997 Volume 7 Number 8 Understanding The Nature Of Inventory: Forms And Positions By Steven A. Melnyk & R.T. "Chris" Christensen
You get a memo from up high informing you that because of increasing inventory costs, it has been decided that inventory should be cut by 30 percent. How did this number come about? You are not sure. It seems to be either a NRN (nice round number) or a magic number. You are also informed that if you don't cut the inventory, your successor will. You look at your inventory profile. You find yourself with fast moving inventory and slow moving inventory. Which do you cut? Most of you will have picked the slow movers and been wrong. Remember that these are slow movers. By definition, it is going to take a long time before we see any reduction in inventory sufficient to meet the 30 percent reduction goal set by management. Instead, you focus on the fast movers. You cut them by more than 30 percent (to compensate for the slow movers). However, you have not attacked the reason for the inventory in the first place. You have imposed an arbitrary approach. The result is that before long, people who needed the inventory begin to notice that there is less of it available. In many cases, the person who notices is the marketing manager. That person probably noticed it because customers were complaining about the lack of inventory. So he/she comes to you and asks what is happening to inventory. You reply that it has been reduced (your answers have a reputation of being to the point). The marketing manager wants to know why. You say that you were instructed to do so by upper management. This answer does not satisfy the marketing manager who proceeds to tell you where you will go when you die, describes the nature of your ancestry, and then leaves. The marketing manager then goes to his/her boss and tells all about the problems he/she is having. Ultimately, as complaints from the customers increase, upper management sees the folly of their ways and increases inventory. In many cases, the new levels are higher than those that previously existed. The lesson in this story is a simple one: You can never mandate an effective long-term reduction in inventory unless you identify and attack the reasons for inventory. However, identifying the functions provided by inventory
is not enough. You must also examine the form and position
of the inventory. The form describes where in the process
the inventory is located. The position of the inventory
describes the location of the inventory in the supply
chain. The second form of inventory is that of work in process. These are items that are being worked within the process. They are nearer the ultimate form desired by the inventory as compared to raw materials. Yet, they are still not ready to be shipped out. The third form is that of finished or shippable goods. These are the items that we provide our customer. They are our end items. Once made, these items require the least amount of lead time (relative to raw materials). Yet, they offer us an interesting trade-off in that they are also the least flexible because they have been configured into their final form (it is difficult to change a red car to a blue car). Of the first forms of inventory, they tend to be most expensive (because of the additional materials, labor and other associated costs incurred during the transformation process). These first three forms are the ones with which most of us are familiar. However, there are two additional forms that inventory can take. The first is maintenance, repair and operating inventory. This is more commonly referred to as MRO. This inventory refers to the stock of items that we need for the operation and maintenance of the transformation process. In MRO, we tend to find items such as rags, oil, staples, nipples for glue guns, and gloves. In many firms, this is a major investment. The final form that inventory can take is that of money. With this form, we recognize that management need not invest in inventories of parts. They can decide that it is in their best interest to keep the resources in cash. With these five forms, we can examine the form
distribution of our inventory (i.e., what percentage is work
in process, raw material, finished goods, MRO and cash).
However, these forms are not enough. We need to look at
where in the supply chain the inventory can be located. Next month, we will look at how to extend this analysis
by using a modified version of ABC analysis. It is dangerous to manage inventory through management mandates. Inventory can take one of five forms: raw materials, work in process, finished goods, MRO and cash. Inventory can be located at one of four places in the supply chain: with our suppliers or in purchasing; within the manufacturing system; within the logistics systems; or in marketing near to the customer. With these six functions, five forms, and four locations, we can develop a tool (a matrix) for determining where the inventory is. The resulting matrix can be used to direct attention and to identify those combinations that are high and offer management opportunities for systematic inventory reductions. Steven A. Melnyk, Ph.D., CPIM, is software editor for APICSThe Performance Advantage. He is also an instructor in the Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management at Michigan State University in East Lansing. R.T. "Chris" Christensen is the director of the executive education program at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Copyright © 2020 by APICS The Educational Society for Resource Management. All rights reserved. All rights reserved. Lionheart Publishing, Inc. 2555 Cumberland Parkway, Suite 299, Atlanta, GA 30339 USA Phone: +44 23 8110 3411 | br> E-mail: Web: www.lionheartpub.com Web Design by Premier Web Designs E-mail: [email protected] |