
June 1996 Volume 6 Number 6
Managing Customer Demand
By Tom Wallace
The following is a verbatim replay of a conversation I had several years
ago.
Tom Wallace: "You guys need to do a better job of managing customer
demand."
Marketing vice president: "Get serious. It's not possible to
manage customer demand."
TW: "Oh no? Didn't you ever announce a price increase early
to bring in lots of orders before the end of the fiscal year?"
VP: "Oh."
Yes, it is possible to affect customer demand. And it can be done for the
benefit of both customer and supplier, not merely for one or the other.
Effective demand management is a potential gold mine for most companies,
and I'm talking about a lot more than just timing price changes. Few companies
manage their total customer demand effectively.
I'll go a step further: Many companies engage in counter-productive demand
management. Because of they way they price, promote, promise orders, and
invoice, they shoot themselves in the foot:
Doing it right
Customer demand should drive the company's operations, and demand management
is the set of processes companies use to ensure that this happens the right
way. Effective demand management enables people to closely monitor demands
for products, thus ensuring that these demands and the resources to meet
them are in sync. It's a key element in being able to ship on time virtually
all the time.
Here are some of the major pieces of demand management:
1. "Linear" promotions and pricing.
The issue here is simple: Do your pricing and sales promotion policies induce
variability in your incoming demand streams? This is potentially wasteful
and thus bad. Or do they encourage linearity of demand? This is cost-effective
and thus good.
Do you offer price breaks for large quantity orders (potentially bad) or
do you give incentives to your customers to give you frequent, smaller orders
to closely match their needs (good)? Do you lurch from promotion to promotion
and from deal to deal (potentially bad)? Or do you-like trend-setter Procter
& Gamble-minimize deals and focus on everyday low pricing?
Dr. Genichi Taguchi, the brilliant quality control expert, pointed out that
variability is bad; linearity is good. This applies to incoming customer
demand every bit as much as to the quality attributes of a product.
2. "Linear" sales force incentives. How do you motivate
your sales people? Do you pay a bonus on reaching a quarterly sales goal?
This may be OK if you're selling insurance policies or big ticket software.
But if you're in the manufacturing business, then I suggest you may be creating
substantial surges in demand as your sales people struggle to hit their
end-of-quarter-or even worse-end-of-year sales goal. The orders get dumped
on the plants, and they have to scramble to meet them. Scrambling usually
costs money-in overtime, in premium freight, and sometimes in warranty costs
for products that were produced during the end-of-the-quarter crunch.
3. Effective sales forecasting is necessary in virtually all
companies for resource acquisition and for financial planning. Effective
sales forecasting will typically involve forecasts in both units and dollars,
generated primarily by the people in sales and marketing. (See this column
for March 1996: "Forecasting 101.")
4. Proactive sales planning. This refers to the details of
what the sales and marketing folks have committed to sell and how they plan
to do it. This can include specific plans by individual sales person, by
territory, by product line, and by market channel. The difference between
the sales forecast and the sales plan is well described by George Palmatier
and Joe Shull in their excellent book, The Marketing Edge. They point out
that the forecast represents customer orders we haven't yet got; the sales
plan is how we're going to get those orders. Sales planning is proactive.
It's "sic 'em."
5. Integrated customer order promising, linked tightly to
manufacturing's master schedule. The key here is linkage. Order entry is
not a stand-alone function; rather it needs to be an integral part of the
company's overall set of processes for procurement, production and shipment.
Best practices here mean customer order promises are based on two elements:
not only the current finished goods inventory but also the future inventory,
derived from information contained within the master production schedule.
This contrasts sharply with a worse practice: "Tell 'em whatever they
want to hear; get the order; and we'll sort it out later." Please see
this column for April 1995: "A Promise Made Is A Debt Unpaid."
6. Abnormal demand control. Here's a quiz: We just received
a customer order for 800 units, right away. We have 850 in inventory. The
forecast is 1,000 per month. Should we promise and ship 800 to the customer
or should we not?
Well, there's really no way you can answer that question without getting
more information. Here are some of the questions to be asked:
- Is this customer part of the forecast? Was his demand planned for in
the forecasting process? If he's a new customer, or an infrequent one, the
answer is probably no.
- What's the probable impact on our current, ongoing customers? Will shipping
this random, large order mean we'll have to backorder our regular customers?
- How soon does this customer actually need the product? Does he have
to receive all 800 at once? What if he took 100 now, with the balance of
the order spread out into the future?
To control abnormal demand well requires several capabilities. Since more
and more companies are receiving orders electronically, logic in the order
entry system is needed to identify and kick out abnormally large orders.
These orders go to a human being-typically in sales and marketing-for a
decision about what to do. The second capability is for those people to
know what questions to ask, such as the above, so they can make informed
decisions. A third need is for them to be empowered to make these calls
and not be second-guessed.
Capture all demands
Please note: Demand management needs to address all demands, not only those
from "the real customers," i.e., the external ones. Other important
demands can come from sister plants within the same division, other divisions
within the corporation, on and on. Winning companies look upon these as
customers also, even though they're a part of the same organization.
Demand management is a set of business processes to help the customers help
their suppliers. Good customers can help their suppliers provide better
service and better products at a lower cost. Effective demand management
makes it easier for the customers to do just that.
A final word to all you customers and suppliers: Remember Taguchi; think
linear.
Tom Wallace is an independent consultant based in Cincinnati. He is the
author of Customer Driven Strategy: Winning Through Operational Excellence
(1992) and editor/author of The Instant Access Guide to World Class Manufacturing
(1994). Tom is co-director and a Distinguished Fellow of the Ohio State
University's Center for Excellence in Manufacturing Management.
For more information about this article, input the number
17 in the appropriate place on the Reader
Service Form
Commentary
I don't understand why Ron Brown had to die. I'm referring to our former
secretary of commerce who, along with dozens of other hard-working, high-achieving
Americans, slammed into a mountain on an approach to Dubrovnik airport.
They died in a military version of a Boeing 737. Many of us are frequent
flyers in 737s (also called "guppies" because they're not very
sleek). These commercial aircraft are chock full of exotic navigation instruments.
They tell the pilots where they are, which heading to follow to the airport
or the next checkpoint, how far away it is, how long it'll take to get there,
how much fuel they'll burn, and so forth. There is redundancy, so that if
one instrument fails, another is there to take its place. The aviation arm
of the federal government requires the airlines to use this equipment because
it increases our safety-yours and mine. I thank the FAA for that.
The Department of Defense apparently doesn't share the same concern for
its passengers' well being. According to press reports, the plane carrying
Secretary Brown and his colleagues was woefully underequipped with navigation
hardware, and not only by today's standards. It was underequipped based
on technology in place more than 30 years ago, when I was in the aviation
business with the U.S. Navy. What in the world is going on here?
I still can't understand why Ron Brown and his colleagues had to die. I
doubt that I ever will.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Production and Inventory Control
Society Inc. All rights reserved.
Click
here to return to the table of contents.