May 1996 € Volume 6 € Number 5


Cellular Manufacturing For Small Manufacturers: A Practical Approach


By Stanley D. Stone,CPIM



A small manufacturer with limited resources revitalized its business by implementing cellular manufacturing, kanban scheduling and visual factory techniques in a carefully developed step-by-step methodology. Other small manufacturers can use the methodology as they evolve toward a cellular manufacturing environment.

Electronic Hardware Corp. (EHC) is a small manufacturer of value-added plastic components consisting primarily of control knobs for the aerospace, industrial and consumer markets. Like many other companies located on Long Island, EHC has struggled to survive defense cutbacks and the lingering recession affecting the New York area.

EHC is a 33-year-old privately owned company employing approximately 90 people in a union environment. EHC utilizes its 20,000-sq.-ft. facility to produce approximately $6 million in sales. The company was founded in 1962 as a supplier to the burgeoning defense industry and continued to grow and prosper until the mid-1980s.

As defense spending decreased, so did profits. By the early 1990s, the company had downsized and began to struggle for survival. Cash flow was poor, accounts payable stretched beyond 100 days, suppliers were beginning to cut off raw materials and the company had maxed out its credit. EHC needed to improve cash-flow and fast! The company had to make radical changes to the way it manufactured products and handled inventory. The following is the actual step-by-step process which began in 1993 and is credited for turning the company around.


The Cell Project Team
Selecting the team. The team should consist of those individuals who will be ultimately responsible for the implementation of the project. Functions represented should include top management, manufacturing, engineering, quality and material management/production control. A group consisting of five to eight people is usually appropriate to achieve the proper group dynamics (sub-teams can be formed as necessary to tackle specific tasks). At EHC, the primary team consisted of seven people: president, director of manufacturing, engineering manager, quality manager, two manufacturing managers and the production control manager.

Developing a cellular manufacturing environment will require a firm commitment from upper management and everyone on the project team. It is a radical re-thinking of how the company conducts business, and the team may encounter many obstacles including: resistance to change, the re-allocation of resources, language/communication barriers, and re-training and cross-training of employees, supervisors and (most importantly) managers. Existing paradigms will be dispelled as the team learns to "think outside the box."

At EHC the transition to cellular manufacturing was the top priority -- it had to be. The team believed that the cell approach would dramatically improve efficiency and lower manufacturing costs.

The primary team met weekly after-hours for three-hour "skull" (brainstorming) sessions. Additionally, the team held monthly status meetings on Saturdays. No one on the team had any prior experience implementing cellular manufacturing or kanban, so self-education became the first order of business. The team allocated the first 30 minutes of each meeting to self-training. This included a group study of videotapes, books and articles that were available on the subject and periodic mentoring from a local consultant.

Secondary teams were commissioned as needed to work on special projects such as the factory layout, flowcard design, training and kanban.

EHC had little or no budget to finance this undertaking, so the cell team had to be very creative. Improvising became a way of life in order to provide the resources necessary to proceed. Existing machines and tooling were cleverly reconfigured to operate in the cells.


Sales and Product Analysis
The key step for any company considering cellular manufacturing is performing a sales/product analysis. Since many companies produce diverse product lines it is necessary to determine which products will produce the greatest economic benefit if converted to cellular manufacturing. Typically these are products produced in a repetitive or continuous flow fashion.

The analysis determines which manufacturing processes the products have in common. Products are sorted into "family groups" by common characteristics such as the manufacturing routings and bills of materials. This step can be fairly easy if the company uses intelligent part numbers or assigns manufacturing categories to part numbers.

Once product family groups have been identified, the pareto technique can be used to identfy which product families will provide the "biggest bang for the buck," that is, the products that run at the highest volume, have the most processes and components in common, and generally seem to be good candidates (sufficient volume) for cell manufacturing.

The analysis of EHC products (see Figure 1) revealed significant links between many products which were considered otherwise discrete. The sales analysis revealed that 60 percent (sales value) of the products produced had very similar attributes. A common denominator between these products (knobs) was they used a similar component (a bushing) and basically followed many of the same manufacturing steps.

Figure 1

Therefore, all knobs with bushings were now considered to be part of the same family-the bushing family. Because of high volume in both sales and units produced, the team agreed to pursue the bushing product family for the first cell project since it offered the greatest economical benefit.


Cell Design
The bushing family shared many of the same processes and used similar types of equipment. Even though products in the family were comparable, they were not identical, so additional processes and equipment needed to be considered for the cells.

The most desirable approach to cellular manufacturing is to build the entire product -- start to finish -- in the same cell (this was the approach EHC would take). If the entire product cannot be built in one cell, the approach should be to assemble a series of cells each building a logical subassembly and feeding a next-higher-assembly cell.

Determine the product family equipment needs. To accomplish this, a process matrix is developed to match each process to the equipment required to perform the process. By using the matrix, common and unique equipment can be identified for each product to be run in the cell.

Next, determine how many cells will be required (or can be built with the existing equipment) to manufacture the entire family group. To do this, two things are needed: the projected capacity of a cell and an inventory of the existing equipment.

Capacity analysis. At EHC, a detailed time study of each process used by the bushing family group was performed. In this case between six and 10 operations were required to manufacture a knob. Since a cell is intended to function as a continuous flow process, the slowest operation (constraint) will determine the throughput of the cell. (The troop cannot march faster than the slowest soldier.) Once the slowest process is determined, it is easy to estimate the capacity (rough cut) of a cell. With the approximate capacity established, the number of cells required and their configurations can be determined. To improve the capacity of a cell, begin with increasing throughput at the constraining process -- if possible.

Equipment inventory. Once the equipment has been identified, an inventory must be taken to determine which assets are available for the cell(s). EHC had no formal asset inventory, so the company took this opportunity to photograph each piece of equipment and affix a numbered inventory tag to it. A specification sheet was completed for each item inventoried to identify attributes such as physical size, power, water and air requirements, as well as the general condition of the equipment. The photograph was attached to the specification sheet and filed in a three-ring binder. This information proved to be indispensable during the cell design and layout stages. If equipment needs to be purchased (and some may), this is a good time to prepare the budget or get creative.

At EHC it was calculated that seven cells were required to meet the demand for the bushing family. Each cell would be staffed with two operators. All seven cells were designed to carry out all the manufacturing steps necessary to build a complete product -- in this case, from a molded plastic shell to a completed knob packed and ready for immediate shipment to the customer.


Cell Implementation
Project management. A project of this magnitude requires conscientious project management. This was accomplished at EHC by defining the critical action steps (milestones), planned completion dates and the individuals who would be responsible. All this information was entered on a Gantt chart which was reviewed at the weekly cell meetings.

The prototype. At EHC, a prototype cell was designed and assembled for use as a "test bed" to prove out the cell concept and to expose any potential problems that had not been anticipated. The cell was arranged in a "C" configuration which would support two operators, one working from the inside and another working on the outside. The throughput and the quality of the knobs produced on the prototype cell exceeded the expectations of the cell team and met with high marks by the cell operators and the customer.

Once the prototype cell was in operation, the team was able to obtain valuable feedback from the operators. Cell operators offered numerous suggestions for improving the process and the ergonomic factors affecting cell performance. Many of these suggestions were incorporated into the design of the remaining six cells.

Plant layout. To accommodate the cells, much of the facility had to be rearranged. We constructed a mock layout and entered it into AutoCad. Using the software we were able to move entire departments around to come up with the best layout. The actual physical moves were conducted after hours and on weekends so production would not be disrupted.

Set-up time reductions. As the cells came on line, the team realized that changes to the existing tooling fixtures and molds were necessary to achieve rapid tool changes. Fast tool changes were important because our intention was to make the cells flexible and replace large batch production with small lot production driven by kanban. The initial set-up time was nearly one hour and has been continuously reduced to approximately 12 minutes.

Quality. Statistical process control was designed into the cell. Each cell was supplied a kit containing all of the necessary quality tools such as calipers, go/no-go gauges, thread gauges and depth gauges. Operators were taught how to use these tools and, most importantly, empowered to stop production if a process went out of control. This was difficult at first because the previous philosophy had been: Never Stop Production!

A database was developed to record actual operational performance and used to set reasonable expectancies (R.E.s) for production at each cell. It was decided that a bonus system would be used to reward the operators for meeting or beating the R.E. To achieve the bonus, the operators must work as a team and balance the line completing as many parts as possible. The bonus system at EHC has been successful and operators have earned an average of six percent over their base pay.


Kanban
Kanban is a Japanese word which literally means card. In the Toyota production system, this "card" is used to initiate the "pull system" for manufacturing scheduling. Kanban/pull systems are used as a scheduling technique and to eliminate the "waste" of overproduction. At EHC we implemented a kanban system using color-coded bins instead of cards. The system is used to supply the cells with component parts as needed to manufacture knobs. These component parts include molded plastic shells produced in-house as well as parts purchased from suppliers.

EHC uses a three-bin kanban system; two bins are located at the point of use and one bin is located at the supplier (internal or external). The kanban system uses yellow bins which have sample parts attached to them for fast part recognition by the operators.

As soon as a bin is emptied (each bin contains enough parts for one shift) it is returned to the internal supplier and a reserve bin is taken and returned to the point of use. The empty bin signals the supplier to make new parts and once the bin has been filled, the supplier stops production of this item (no waste). The supplier has 24 hours to complete the transaction. The second bin at the point of use is extra -- it is kept as emergency buffer stock-in case of machine breakdown.

All primary suppliers were brought on board before the program was started and agreed to support the Just-in-Time (JIT)/kanban system. When a bin containing a purchased part is emptied, it is brought to the receiving department. Next, the operator faxes a kanban request form to the supplier. The supplier immediately ships replacement parts to EHC using a next-day delivery service. Once the replacement parts arrive, they are placed into the empty bin and returned to the point of use. The operator who ordered the parts will now inspect them and put them into the kanban system. Note: The operator performs both the purchasing and incoming inspection functions for this transaction.


Visual factory
At EHC, the seven new cells now manufacture products accounting for approximately 60 percent of total dollars shipped. Because of the financial impact, downtime and missed schedules can create a very serious problem.

In the beginning, measuring cell downtime and throughput was difficult because of the lack of systems and timely information. Because the computer system at EHC was "state of the ark" (not "state of the art") technology, it took a minimum of 24 hours to get feedback on cell performance. If problems occurred (and they did), information was received too late to take corrective action.


Resolution
A red warning light was mounted above each cell to be used to indicate that the cell was experiencing a quality problem, production problem or delay (including repairs or machine set-ups). The cell operators were empowered to stop production if the process generated defects. The warning light now provides instant feedback to the manufacturing and quality managers who take immediate action to resolve any problems.

To provide "real-time" information on the throughput performance of each cell, inexpensive dry-erase boards were mounted on the cells. These boards are used to display the hourly performance of each cell. Schedules are set based on the reasonable expectancy established for the particular product running. The schedule is cumulative over the entire eight-hour shift and the operators enter their actual production for each two-hour time segment. If a cell is on or ahead of schedule, the operators enter the production number using a green marker. If the schedule is not achieved, the operator uses a red marker.

All cells and schedule boards face the same direction so factory managers and floor supervisors can obtain a "status at a glance" and offer help if needed. The schedule boards worked so well in the cells that this concept was extended to many of the other non-cell operations. The results have been excellent-the operators know what is expected of them and management knows what is happening.

Prior to the cell project, various size and color bins were used to contain the work-in-process (WIP). This was very confusing and unproductive. WIP (especially rework) was lost for weeks at a time! The team instituted a new system which standardized the size of the bins used and established a color code for the bins. A three-color system was adopted: yellow, blue and red. Yellow bins were designated for kanban use only. Blue bins were used only for standard parts not on the kanban. Red bins were designated for rework or customer returns only. At a glance, the mix of work on the EHC factory floor can now be assessed and rework can no longer hide!


Education
Training. Training should begin at the start of the project and never stop! Within six months all seven cells at EHC had been placed into operation. Training became a major focus for the cell team. Operators who previously had only one simple task (such as working a drill press) were now responsible for several operations (such as drilling, taping, reaming and statistical process control). To complicate matters, most of the operators spoke little or no English.

An English as a Second Language (ESL) training program was instituted-and continues today. The operators were educated on JIT, kanban and statistical process control (SPC). An SPC system was put into place and the operators were furnished with calipers, depth gauges, and an assortment of go/no-go gauges. All cell operators were trained how to use these instruments.


Moving On
Repeat as necessary. Once all of the previous steps have been completed, repeat them as necessary for all the remaining product families.


Measurable benefits
The implementation of cellular manufacturing, kanban and the simple visual factory techniques has had an astonishing impact on EHC. Here are some of the measurable benefits accrued to EHC in 1994, the first year following implementation:

The most important benefit was the positive cash-flow which was reinvested and used to pay down creditors. In 1994, EHC showed a profit for the first time since 1987!

In 1995, EHC has continued to make improvements. Small molding machines are being tested in cells and will eventually eliminate the inventory of all plastic components -- including kanban. EHC's financial situation is dramatically improved. And thanks to the gainsharing program implemented in January, the employees are now sharing in the success that they have created.


Stan Stone, CPIM, is director of manufacturing operations for Electronic Hardware Corp. in Farmingdale, N.Y. He has 22 years of production control, systems development and operations management experience in large and small companies. He is vice president of programs for the APICS Long Island Chapter.

For more information about this article, input the number 2 in the appropriate place on the Reader Service Form



Copyright © 2020 by the American Production and Inventory Control Society Inc. All rights reserved.

Click here to return to the table of contents.