
Intelligent Systems Report August 1996 Volume 13
No. 8
Artificial intelligence as a field of research has been around for
more than 40 years, and yet it continues to fascinate the public's
imagination while attracting new adherents to devote their lives to
tackling its mysteries. Perhaps this comment, from one of the 1,500
attendees at the 13th National Conference on AI (AAAI '96), held
earlier this month in Portland, Ore., sums it up best: "AI is a
wonderful field to get into because it's both highly applied and
highly theoretical."
AAAI '96 certainly illustrated both aspects of AI's appeal,
highlighting money-making, real-world applications at its Innovative
Applications of AI program (see article, p. 7), while providing a
forum for the nuts-and-bolts R&D efforts that will go into
producing the next generation of intelligent systems. Based on the
evidence at hand in Portland, the AI field is in good shape as it
heads into the next century.
What works, what doesn't
Frederick Hayes-Roth, CEO of Teknowledge (Palo Alto, Calif.), was
chosen to give the keynote presentation on the successes and failures
of the AI field, and where it is likely to succeed in the future. His
company, Teknowledge, is itself a testimony to the power of
persistence since it was one of the original Gang of Four expert
system shell vendors which hit it big by going public back in the
mid-1980s, then got gobbled up in a poorly-executed merger with
American Cimflex in the late 1980s, then virtually disappeared from
all radar screens as Cimflex Teknowledge in the early 1990s.
Recently, all vestiges of the Cimflex connection have vanished, and
the company has returned once more to its expert system roots with
its M4 expert system product, a descendant of the original M1.
"The AI field should be able to achieve continuous, incremental
progress," Hayes-Roth began. He then proceeded to list some of the
proven intelligent technologies, such as representation (languages,
domain modeling, knowledge engineering), inference (theorem-proving,
heuristic reasoning, matching techniques), control (search
algorithms, scheduling, demons, etc.), and problem-solving
architectures (rule-based, frame-based, constraint-based, blackboard,
object-oriented, etc.).
These technologies, Hayes-Roth pointed out, have led to a number of
success stories for the AI field, such as speech recognition systems,
autonomous and tele-operated vehicles, various domain-specific
planning and scheduling systems, hundreds of case-based assistants,
and literally thousands of domain-specific expert systems. However,
when you take the time to examine what makes a successful intelligent
system, you'll find - as Hayes-Roth did - that "AI research hasn't
produced reusable components." In other words, every intelligent
system almost has to reinvent the wheel every time out, since these
systems typically are expensive to develop, are focused on a specific
domain and usually just a few specific tasks within that domain, and
are highly customized.
"The scope of knowledge incorporated to date is too small," he
explained. Individual projects succeed, and succeed phenomenally
well, but these individual projects cannot be combined to compose
systems of wider scope and capability. "We must find a way to
integrate across tasks," he urged.
The principal strategy for developing the next generation of
intelligent systems, according to Hayes-Roth, should emphasize:
Rising to the challenge
Taking its cue from Hayes-Roth's vision of the next generation, a
panel of AI experts set forth their own challenge problems for the AI
field as a whole to tackle.
For instance, Tom Mitchell with Carnegie Mellon University wants to
see programs built that turn the World Wide Web into the world's
largest knowledge base. "The challenge is to build programs that can
`read' the Web and turn it into, say, a frame-based symbolic
representation that mirrors the content of the Web." He also urged,
"Let's build agents that exhibit life-long machine learning, rather
than machine learning algorithms that learn one thing and then get
rebooted." And he'd like to see the field apply machine learning to
learn to understand natural language.
MIT's Rodney Brooks, one of the leading artificial life researchers,
asked, "Can we build a program which can install itself and run
itself on an unknown architecture? How about a program which can
probe an unknown architecture from a known machine and reconfigure a
version of itself to run on the unknown machine?" And ultimately,
"Can we build a system by evolution that is better at a non-trivial
task than anything that has been built by hand?"
Nils Nilsson, with Stanford University, asked for a robot that can
perform "any task that a human might "reasonably" expect it to be
able to perform given its effort/sensor suite. [And] the robot must
stay on-the-job and functioning for a year without being sent back to
the factory for re-programming."
Eric Horvitz from Microsoft had a challenge for his fellow software
developers: Develop "comprehensive autonomous decision-making systems
that are situated in dynamic environments over extended periods of
time, and that are entrusted with handling varied, complex
tasks."
And Thomas Dean from Brown University issued a challenge "to
theorists, experimentalists and practitioners alike to raise the
level of expectation for collaborative scientific research in
planning."
Digital pre-assembly at Boeing
The AAAI show even ventured outside its usual parameters to highlight
some advances in virtual reality R&D. Airplane manufacturer
Boeing (Seattle, Wash.) has developed FlyThru, a digital pre-assembly
system for checking designs. Using FlyThru, a spin-off of a Boeing
advanced computing research project, engineers are able to view up to
1500 models in 3-D at high speed. This virtual reality system was
first deployed a few years ago to meet the needs of the Boeing 777
aircraft for large-scale product visualization and verification.
According to Bob Abarbanel, with Boeing's Information & Support
Services, the digital pre-assembly process has met with very
favorable results. "The 777 has had far fewer assembly and systems
problems compared to previous airplane programs," Abarbanel
reported.
Today, FlyThru is installed on hundreds of workstations on almost
every airplane program, according to Abarbanel, and is being used on
the Space Station, F22s, AWACS, and other defense projects. "In many
ways, FlyThru is a data warehouse supported by advanced tools for
analysis," he explained. The system is currently being integrated
with knowledge-based engineering geometry generation tools.
Vendor roundup
Since this newsletter debuted back in 1983, we've been tracking the
ebbs and flows of the AI industry, and one of the barometers we used
in the past was the size of the trade show at the annual AAAI
conferences. Once upon a time, when the major hardware vendors
participated, the AAAI exhibitions were almost legendary displays of
overzealous enthusiasm combined with pure innovation, wrapped up in a
slick presentation. Those days ended in the early 1990s when the
hardware vendors packed up and moved on; so for the past few years,
the AAAI trade show has been a much smaller affair. Nevertheless, it
remains one of the most significant venues for exhibitors of proven
intelligent products to display their wares.
Following are capsule summaries of the products exhibited by the
major AAAI '96 vendors:
Click
here to return to Table of Contents for the ISR August
issue